Learn about the Zachman approach to enterprise architecture. Reference Architecture for 500Seat Citrix XenApp 7. Deployment on Cisco UCS C240M3 Rack Servers with OnBoard SAS Storage and LSI Nytro MegaRAID Controller. Reference Architecture for 5. Seat Citrix Xen. App 7. Deployment on Cisco UCS C2. M3 Rack Servers with On Board SAS Storage and LSI Nytro Mega. RAID Controller. Reference Architecture for 5. NeXTSTEP is a discontinued objectoriented, multitasking operating system based on UNIX. It was developed by NeXT Computer in the late 1980s and early 1990s and was. Over the last decade, the service sector has become the biggest and fastestgrowing business sector in the world. For the first time ever, it now employs most people. Bringing Architecture To The Next Level Pdf' title='Bringing Architecture To The Next Level Pdf' />Seat Citrix Xen. App 7. Deployment on Cisco UCS C2. M3 Rack Servers with On Board SAS Storage and LSI Nytro Mega. RAID Controller June 2. Contents. 1 Executive Summary. Solution Overview and Components. Reference Architecture Overview. Estados Unidos, se download using jruby bringing ruby to java Religion air architects science inclusion maturity functionality. La comunidad israelita en Estados. We work at all scales and in all sectors. We create transformative cultural, corporate, residential and other spaces that work in synchronicity with their surroundings. Bringing Architecture To The Next Level Pdf' title='Bringing Architecture To The Next Level Pdf' />Cisco UCS Platform and C Series Servers. LSI Nytro Mega. RAID Controller. Gives information about the school, admission process, programs, places, people and events. Citrix Xen. Server. Citrix Xen. App 7. Test Setup and Configurations. Seat Knowledge Worker6. Seat Task Worker Test Configuration. Testing Methodology. Testing Procedure. Login VSI Test Results. Results Single Server Recommended Maximum Density. Cisco UCS C2. 40 M3 Full Scale Results for Citrix Xen. App 7. 5. Conclusion. References. Cisco Reference Documents. Citrix Reference Documents. One of the biggest barriers to entry for desktop virtualization DV is the capital expense for deploying to small offices and branch offices. For small and medium size customers, currently deployment of a DV system for 5. To overcome the entry point barrier, we have developed a self contained DV solution that can host up to 5. Citrix Xen. App 7. Hosted Shared Desktops HSDs on three managed Cisco UCS C2. M3 Rack Servers and provide system fault tolerance at both the server level and for the following required infrastructure virtual machines VMs Citrix Xen. Server 6. 2 Hypervisors 3Microsoft Server 2. R2 Infrastructure Virtual Machines 8Microsoft Active Directory Domain Controllers 2Microsoft SQL Server 2. R2 2Microsoft DFS File Servers for User Data and User Profiles 2 1. TBCitrix Xen. Center 6. Citrix Xen. App 7. Desktop Studio 2 Citrix Xen. App 7. 5 RDS Virtual Machines 2. The Cisco UCS components used to validate the configuration are Cisco UCS 6. UP 4. 8 port Fabric Interconnects 2Cisco UCS Manager 2. Cisco UCS C2. 40 M3 Rack Servers 3 Intel Xeon E5 2. GHz processors 2 2. GB 1. 86. 6 MHz DIMMs 1. GB Cisco UCS Virtual Interface Card VIC 1. LSI Nytro Mega. RAID 2. Polar Plunge Computer Game on this page. G Controller Cisco 6. GB 1. 0,0. 00 RPM hot swappable SAS drives 1. Cisco 6. 50 watt power supply 2Note All of the infrastructure VMs were hosted on two of the three Cisco UCS C2. M3 Rack Servers. Each rack server hosted eight Xen. App 7. 5 HSD VMs. We utilized the unique capabilities of the Nytro Mega. RAID 2. 00. G controller cache to support our Xen. App 7. 5 Machine Creation Service MCS differencing disks. These disposable disks incur high IOPS during the lifecycle of the Hosted Shared Desktop sessions. Configuration of the controller flash and SAS drives is accomplished through the Nytro Mega. RAID BIOS Config Utility configuration wizard, which is accessed during the Cisco UCS C2. M3 rack servers boot sequence by pressing the CTRL H key sequence when the controller BIOS loads. See Section 3, Test Setup and Configuration for details on the test configurationOur configuration provides excellent virtual desktop end user experience for 5. MediumKnowledge Worker Hosted Shared Desktop sessions as measured by our test tool, Login VSI, at a breakthrough price point with server, infrastructure and user file fault tolerance. If your environment is primarily LightTask Worker focused, we demonstrated support for over 3. LightTask Worker HSD sessions per rack server as measured by our test tool, Login VSI. The solution configuration above, could comfortably host 6. Wp Ultimate Recipe Premium. LightTask Worker HSD sessions with the same levels of fault tolerance described for 5. MediumKnowledge Workers. With options to use lower bin processors, such as the Intel Xeon E5 2. Xen. Desktop virtual machine density. As with any solution deployed to users with data storage requirements, a backup solution must be deployed to ensure the integrity of the user data. Such a solution is outside the scope of this paper. The intended audience for this paper includes customer, partner, and integrator solution architects, professional services, IT managers, and others who are interested in deploying this reference architecture. The paper describes the reference architecture and its components, and provides test results, best practice recommendations, and sizing guidelines where applicable. While the reference architecture can deploy seamless applications as well as HSDs, the test configuration validated the architecture with 5. HSD Knowledge Worker and 6. HSD Task Worker workloads. There are multiple approaches to application and desktop virtualization. The best method for any deployment depends on the specific business requirements and the types of tasks that the user population will typically perform. This reference architecture represents a straightforward and cost effective strategy for implementing two virtualization models using Xen. AppStreamed Applications and Hosted Shared Desktopswhich are defined as follows Streamed Applications Streamed desktops and applications run entirely on the users local client device and are sent from the Xen. App server on demand. The user interacts with the application or desktop directly but desktop and application resources are only available while connected to the network. Hosted Shared Desktops A hosted, server based desktop is a desktop where the user interacts through adelivery protocol. With Hosted Shared Desktops, multiple users simultaneously share a single installed instance of a server operating system, such as Microsoft Windows Server 2. Each user receives a desktop session and works in an isolated memory space. Session virtualization leverages server sideprocessing. For a more detailed introduction to the different Xen. App deployment models, see http www. In this reference architecture Figure 1, the combination of Citrix and Cisco technologies transforms the delivery of Microsoft Windows apps and desktops into cost effective, highly secure services that users can access on any device, anywhere. The solution strives to reduce complexity in design and implementation, enabling a simple, centrally managed virtualization infrastructure. The managed Cisco UCS C2. M3 design provides single wire connectivity and leverages Ciscos UCS Service Profiles to ensure that both ongoing maintenance and capacity expansion are seamless and simplified. Figure 1. Citrix Xen. App 7. 5 on Managed Cisco UCS C2. M3 5. 00 User Solution Architecture. Data Center Top of Rack Architecture Design. What You Will Learn. Forward looking IT departments are preparing their data centers for the future by integrating support for 1. Gigabit Ethernet and a unified network fabric into their switching and cabling strategies. Since the typical data center lifecycle is 1. Cabling architectures, if not chosen correctly, could force an early replacement of the cabling infrastructure to meet connectivity requirements as the network and computer technologies evolve. Todays data centers deploy a variety of cabling models and architectures. With the migration from Gigabit Ethernet to 1. Gigabit Ethernet, cabling and network switching architectures are being reevaluated to help ensure a cost effective and smooth data center transition. The choice of cabling architecture will affect throughput, expandability, sustainability, optimum density, energy management, total cost of ownership TCO and return on investment ROI. Anticipating growth and technological changes can be difficult, but the data center should be able to respond to growth and changes in equipment, standards, and demands while remaining manageable and reliable. This document examines the use of the top of rack To. R cabling and switching model for next generation data center infrastructure. It explores current 1. Gigabit Ethernet cabling choices and provides a solution architecture based on To. R to address architectural challenges. Data center managers and facilities administrators will choose cabling architectures based on various factors. The To. R model offers a clear access layer migration path to an optimized high bandwidth network and cabling facilities architecture that features low capital and operating expenses and supports a rack and roll computer deployment model that increases business agility. The data centers access layer, or equipment distribution area EDA, presents the biggest challenge to managers as they choose a cabling architecture to support data center computer connectivity needs. The To. R network architecture and cabling model proposes the use of fiber as the backbone cabling to the rack, with copper and fiber media for server connectivity at the rack level. Introduction. The data center landscape is changing rapidly. IT departments building new data centers, expanding existing data center footprints, or updating racks of equipment all have to design a cabling and switching architecture that supports rapid change and mobility and accommodate transitions to 1. Gigabit Ethernet over time. The main factors that IT departments must address include the following Modularity and flexibility is of paramount importance The need to rapidly deploy new applications and easily scale existing ones has caused server at a time deployment to give way to a rack at a time model. Many IT departments are ordering preconfigured racks of equipment with integrated cabling and switching and as many as 9. The time required to commission new racks and decommission old ones is now a matter of hours rather than days or weeks. Because different racks have different IO requirements, data center switching and cabling strategies must support a wide variety of connectivity requirements at any rack position. Bandwidth requirements are increasing Todays powerful multisocket, multicore servers, blade systems, and integrated server and rack systems, often running virtualization software, are running at higher utilization levels and impose higher bandwidth demands. Some server racks are populated with servers requiring between five and seven Gigabit Ethernet connections and two Fibre Channel SAN connections each. IO connectivity options are evolving IO connectivity options are evolving to accommodate the need for increasing bandwidth, and good data center switching and cabling strategies need to accommodate all connectivity requirements at any rack position. Racks today can be equipped with Gigabit Ethernet or 1. Gigabit Ethernet or a unified network fabric with Fibre Channel over Ethernet FCo. E. Virtualization is being added at every layer of the data center Server virtualization is promoting server consolidation and increasing the need for bandwidth and access to network attached storage NAS. Virtualization is one of the main areas of focus for IT decision makers. Estimates suggest that the server virtualization market will grow by 4. The change to virtualization can be disruptive and necessitate a redesign of the networking infrastructure to gain all the benefits of the virtualized computer platform. The challenge facing data centers today is how to support the modularity and flexibility that is needed to promote business agility and maintain a companys competitive edge. The same strategy that allows the intermixing of different rack types and IO requirements must also support a varied set of connectivity options including Gigabit Ethernet and 1. Gigabit Ethernet as well as a unified network fabric. Why Use Top of Rack Architecture Rapidly changing business requirements impose a corresponding need for flexibility and mobility in data centers. Because of the significant cost of building a new data center, designing an infrastructure that provides the flexibility to meet business objectives while increasing ROI is an IT imperative. By building the data center infrastructurepower and cooling, cabling, etc. Many organizations are now deploying modular data centers. IT departments are increasingly deploying not just servers but racks of servers at a time. Racks of servers, blade systems, and integrated rack and blade systems are often purchased in preconfigured racks with power, network, and storage cabling preinstalled so that racks can be commissioned within hours, not days, from the time they arrive on the loading dock. While server form factors are evolving, and some racks can host up to 9. To. R solutions complement rack at a time deployment by simplifying and shortening cable runs and facilitating the replication of rack configurations. This rack and roll deployment model offers a solution by placing switching resources in each rack so that server connectivity can be aggregated and interconnected with the rest of the data center through a small number of cables connected to end of row Eo. R access or aggregation layer switches. The TIAEIA 9. 42 specification provides a simple reference for data center cabling that supports different cabling schemes, Eo. Iso Container Corner Castings For Shipping. R or To. R, to meet differing needs from a physical and operational perspective. The To. R model defines an architecture in which servers are connected to switches that are located within the same or adjacent racks, and in which these switches are connected to aggregation switches typically using horizontal fiber optic cabling. To. R switching allows oversubscription to be handled at the rack level, with a small number of fiber cables providing uniform connectivity to each rack. The advantage of this solution is that horizontal fiber can support different IO connectivity options, including Gigabit Ethernet and 1. Gigabit Ethernet as well as Fibre Channel. The use of fiber from each rack also helps protect infrastructure investments as evolving standards, including 4. Gigabit Ethernet, are more likely to be implemented using fiber before any other transmission mechanism.